Android Studio Implementations profile

August 15, 2021

I have an Android application and i need to add couple features. i need to be able to see the implementations in the emulator

Database

If you use a database to store your app’s data, expect 15 points. Using Firebase Auth does not count as a database.

Network Backend
If you have a shared database between instances of your app, such as hosting a MySQL server that is accessed directly by your app, expect 5 points.

Firebase Cloud Storage will be 15 points.

If you have written a REST API, expect 20 points.

Design Patterns
Singleton – expect 1 point

Factory – expect 5 points

Command – expect 8 points

Facade – 2 points

Dependency Injection
If you have made light use of dependency injection, expect 5 points. If you have used it throughout the entire app, expect 15 points.

Kotlin
If you have made light use of Kotlin (a few classes), expect 3 points. If you have used it throughout the entire app, expect 15 points

Social Media/ alternative login methods
If you add the ability to login with Facebook, Google, etc, expect 5 points for the first service then 1 point per additional service. Using email/password with Firebase Auth doesn’t count.

Push notifications / AJAX – 5 points

Email password recovery – 5 points

Fuzzy search for items – 2 points

Guest user – 2 points

Admin lock/unlock – 3 points

Lockout after 3 failed tries – 3 points

Use of location services (using the device’s GPS data) – 5 points

Google Maps (for directions) – 3 points

Graphs – 2 points each

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.